Basic Technology Education as a Foundational Determinant of English Language Learning in EFL Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67008/j2b0k104Keywords:
basic technology education; English language learning; EFL contexts; digital literacy; educational technologyAbstract
The rapid integration of digital technology in education has fundamentally transformed English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning contexts, yet many learners continue to experience difficulties in developing adequate English proficiency. One critical but often overlooked factor is students’ basic technology education, which shapes their readiness to engage with digital learning environments. This study aims to examine the role of basic technology education as a foundational determinant of English language learning in EFL contexts. Employing a qualitative descriptive research design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving EFL students and instructors in a formal educational setting. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns related to technological readiness, learning engagement, and language development. The findings reveal that limited basic technology skills significantly hinder students’ access to digital learning resources, reduce participation in technology-mediated language activities, and negatively affect learning motivation and autonomy. Conversely, students with adequate foundational technology education demonstrate higher engagement, greater confidence in using digital tools, and improved opportunities for meaningful English practice. The discussion highlights that basic technology education functions not merely as a supporting factor but as a prerequisite for effective EFL learning in the digital era. This study concludes that strengthening basic technology education is essential for enhancing English language learning outcomes. Integrating foundational technology skills into early educational curricula can foster more inclusive, effective, and sustainable EFL instruction.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fawaid, A., Casmini, C., & Huda, M. (2023). Assessment and Intervention of Aggressive Behavior in Children. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 6171–6183. Retrieved from http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/4064
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2022). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 international report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19389-8
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Emerging technologies for language learning: Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 5–17.
Irawan, D. H., Suwarso, S., Janoko, J., & Khoiruman, M. A. (2025). Leveraging Social Media to Enhance English Language Learning Effectiveness: Insights from the Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Banyuwangi Regency. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 1741-1754.
Lai, C., & Zheng, D. (2023). Self-directed use of technology for language learning: The role of digital competence and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902985
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2021). Naturalistic inquiry (Updated ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2023). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Zhang, R. (2023). Language learners’ perceptions of AI-powered language learning tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2038615
Patton, M. Q. (2022). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed., updated). SAGE Publications.
Panadero, E. (2022). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866142
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2023). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu): Update and implications. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2153–2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11245-6
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Tang, H., Chaw, L. Y., & Chen, Y. (2023). Digital literacy and student engagement in higher education: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 195, 104711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104711
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-2